Episode 45 — Close POA&M Items Effectively
Closing POA&M items confirms that risks have been mitigated or accepted through proper review. This episode outlines how to validate corrective actions, collect closure evidence, and document concurrence from the 3PAO or authorizing official as required. We detail evidence expectations: rescanned results showing vulnerability resolution, configuration screenshots with timestamps, approval tickets referencing implemented changes, or updated policies proving procedural fixes. You will learn how to distinguish between “remediated,” “risk accepted,” and “false positive” closures, ensuring each includes rationale and sign-off that will withstand FedRAMP PMO audit. Closure accuracy is essential for maintaining trust in continuous monitoring data and renewal assessments.
We illustrate how to manage closure workflow and verification cadence. Implement peer reviews before submitting items as closed, track closure metrics to monitor efficiency, and retain prior versions for traceability. For recurring vulnerabilities, document systemic changes that prevent recurrence—patch automation, configuration hardening, or additional monitoring. For risk acceptance, capture authorizing official letters or change-control board minutes referencing the decision. Periodically audit closed items to confirm evidence retention and verify that resolved issues do not reappear in subsequent scans. Timely, verifiable closures show continuous control maturity and reinforce agency confidence that authorization remains well-managed. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
