Episode 49 — Submit for PMO Review
A successful FedRAMP PMO submission depends on completeness, internal consistency, and reviewer-friendly organization of the entire package. This episode details how to assemble the SSP, SAP/SAR, POA&M, attachments, scan artifacts, interconnection documents, privacy materials, letters, and cover forms into a coherent set with stable filenames, versioning, and checksums. We explain how to prepare a submission index that mirrors the PMO checklist, how to reference each artifact from the SSP so reviewers can navigate quickly, and how to secure the transfer channel with encryption and access controls appropriate to the data. We also describe pre-submission readiness checks that surface contradictions—parameter mismatches, inheritance claims without attestations, boundary diagrams that omit components in inventories—before the PMO finds them.
After submission, responsiveness and traceability determine how fast the review closes. Establish a triage team to manage Requests for Information (RFIs), assign owners, provide precise page and line references, and resubmit updated artifacts with clear redlines and a change summary. Preserve immutable copies of each submitted version and maintain an issue log that tracks questions, decisions, and follow-up evidence. Coordinate with your 3PAO when clarifications touch assessment methods or findings so that the SAR remains authoritative. Anticipate reviewers’ needs by supplying additional context—without adding noise—when a condition or exception is central to the risk story. A deliberate, organized PMO interaction shortens cycles and sets the tone for a smooth transition into authorization and continuous monitoring. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
