Episode 53 — Analyze and Report Scan Results
Scanning only provides raw data; analysis transforms it into actionable insight. This episode outlines how to interpret vulnerability results, identify trends, and communicate remediation progress to both internal stakeholders and agencies. We explain the metrics FedRAMP reviewers expect: counts of open findings by severity, aging of unresolved vulnerabilities, percentage of hosts fully remediated, and average closure time compared to required deadlines. You will learn how to visualize data for clarity—highlighting recurring misconfigurations, patching cadence, or dependency lag—and how to correlate findings with change events or specific code releases. Transparent reporting proves that risk is being managed systematically rather than reactively.
We extend into communication and evidence alignment. For each monthly submission, provide executive summaries with trend commentary, attach raw scanner exports, and map findings directly to POA&M entries. Examples demonstrate how to explain spikes caused by new plugin sets or platform versioning rather than regressions in posture. Use normalized identifiers and stable asset tags so the same resource can be tracked across cycles. Conduct internal “findings review” meetings to prioritize work and verify that remediation tickets close with verifiable proof. Effective analysis transforms static numbers into a narrative of continuous improvement that both 3PAOs and agencies can easily validate. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
